Evidence Hub

Comparative outcomes between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in heart failure: real world multi-center cohort study

S. Bu, H. Ahn, M. Jung, D. Lee, Y. Hwang, J. S. Cho, J. Yi, H. Kim et al.

European Heart Journal, 2024

6,281 participants

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a significant global health concern, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have emerged as important therapeutic options. However, their comparative effectiveness in a real-world population remains uncertain.

The purpose of this multicenter, population-based cohort study was to investigate and compare the outcomes associated with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin use in patients with heart failure. We sought to understand whether these SGLT2 inhibitors had differential effects on cardiovascular events in a real-world setting.

We analysed data from a clinical data warehouse encompassing seven medical centers. Subjects diagnosed with heart failure between January 2021 and November 2023, who were prescribed dapagliflozin or empagliflozin, were included. We conducted one-to-one propensity-score matching, ensuring that the dapagliflozin and empagliflozin groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization for HF, analysed as the first event occurring after starting each medication. Secondary outcomes included individual components, all-cause death, and CV hospitalization.

Propensity-score matching made a balanced cohort of 6,281 patients (3,111 in the dapagliflozin group and 3,170 in the empagliflozin group). The median follow-up duration was 16.0 months. In the propensity-score matched cohort, dapagliflozin and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,281 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free