Evidence Hub

Longitudinal Evolution and Plasma Biomarkers for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson's Disease

Lin J, Li C, Ou R, Hou Y, Zhang L, Wei Q, Liu K, Jiang Q et al.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2024

159 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is one of the most frequent nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, the pathogenesis of EDS is unclear, and there is a lack of information on plasma biomarkers for EDS in PD. We aimed to investigate the plasma biomarkers of EDS in a large PD cohort.

METHODS: A total of 159 PD patients were included in the prospective cohort study and followed up annually for 3 years. Plasma biomarkers including glial fibrillary acidic protein, amyloid-beta, p-tau181, and neurofilament light chain (NfL), were measured using an ultrasensitive single-molecule array (Simoa) technology at each visit. EDS was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).

RESULTS: The frequency of EDS in PD increased from 15.1% at baseline to 25.0% after 3 years. The mean ESS scores increased from 5.1 (standard deviation [SD]: 4.8) at baseline to 6.1 (SD: 5.5) at the third year of follow-up. At baseline, compared with patients with PD without EDS, those with EDS were more likely to be male, had poorer cognitive performance, and more severe motor and nonmotor symptoms. The adjusted generalized estimating equations models showed that higher plasma NfL levels (OR: 1.047 [1.002-1.094], p = .042) were associated with EDS during follow-ups. The adjusted linear mixed-effects model showed that higher plasma NfL levels (β 0.097 [0.012-0.183], p = .026) were associated with ESS scores during follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS: Higher plasma NfL levels were associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free