Evidence Hub

Dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin and major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study

A. Alhakak, L. Køber, M. Petrie, P. Jhund, N. Dridi, M. Karacan, M. Schou, M. Elmegaard et al.

European Heart Journal, 2024

61,031 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Large randomized clinical trials have shown that sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether these effects might differ between individual SGLT2-inhbitors remain unclear given the lack of head-to-head comparisons.

To examine the association between treatment with dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin and the long-term rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with T2DM.

Using nationwide registries, all Danish residents with T2DM, who initiated treatment with dapagliflozin or empagliflozin from 2015 to 2020, were identified. Only treatment with dapagliflozin or empagliflozin was considered in the present analysis, since approximately 3% initiated treatment with other SGLT2-inhibitors (i.e., canagliflozin and ertugliflozin). Patients were followed from date of the first claimed prescription of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin until the outcome of interest, emigration, death, or end of study (December 31, 2021). The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (i.e., time to first heart failure hospitalisation, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, or all-cause mortality). The primary outcome was compared between the dapagliflozin and empagliflozin group, overall and in prespecified subgroups of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 61,031 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free