Centering Impact and Equity in the Next 50 Years of Eating Disorder Research
Abstract
Over the past 50 years, there has been a significant increase in research on eating disorders, which is encouraging and necessary given the substantial mortality, morbidity, and personal and societal costs of these common conditions. However, improvements in prevention, treatment access, and outcomes have been slow, and research priorities have not always been aligned with the needs and interests of affected communities. In this commentary, we call on the field to think critically about how to maximize not only the volume but also the real-world impact of the next 50 years of eating disorder research. In particular, we highlight the importance of creating a research ecosystem that nurtures methodological diversity and centers collaborative, participatory research in partnership with people with lived experience. We also underscore the importance of conducting inclusive research that makes space for the full diversity of eating disorder presentations and the people who experience them. Ultimately, we argue that creativity and commitment will be required along with shifts in training, academic incentives, and broader structures to realize the full potential of research to enhance the lives of those with eating disorders.
Read the paper
Related studies
- The Matrisome: In Silico Definition and In Vivo Characterization by Proteomics of Normal and Tumor Extracellular Matrices
- The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: Its definition, characteristics, and capabilities
- In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling
- In silico prediction of splice-altering single nucleotide variants in the human genome
- In silico clinical trials: how computer simulation will transform the biomedical industry
- In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.