Evidence Hub

Personalized Orbital Fracture Repair: Enhancing 3D-Printed Titanium Mesh with Biomimetic 3D-Printed HAP-COL Frameworks

Lazăr O, Istrate S, Popa-Cherecheanu A, Cursaru LM, Popescu D, Catrina AM, Hăidoiu C, Suhăianu V et al.

Romanian journal of ophthalmology, 2026

Abstract

Objective: Orbital wall fractures require precise reconstruction to restore orbital volume and visual function, and bio-inert titanium implants benefit substantially from osteoconductive surface modifications. This study evaluated the biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of hydroxyapatite-collagen (HAP-COL) composites used in titanium implants intended for orbital fracture repair, comparing a sprayed HAP coating with a robocasting-deposited, 3D-printed HAP-COL layer.

Methods: HAp-COL hybrid powder (HAp:COL mass ratio 4:1) was prepared by hydrothermal synthesis at 100 °C and 104 Pa, followed by spray drying, and characterized by FAAS, ICP-OES, FT-IR, XRD, and SEM-EDS. Two implant configurations were tested: Sample 1 (titanium with sprayed HAp) and Sample 2 (titanium with three robocasting-deposited 3D-printed HAP-COL layers). Cytotoxicity was assessed on a normal human osteoblast cell line (NHOst, Lonza CC-2538) in accordance with ISO 10993-12, using sample extracts at stock concentration and binary dilutions (1/2, 1/4, 1/8) and quantified by MTT assay at 24 and 48 hours.

Results: Both samples showed dose- and time-dependent viability profiles within the acceptable limits of ISO 10993-5. Sample 1 viability ranged from 70.62% (stock) to 89.72% (1/8) at 24 h, and from 77.28% to 93.63% at 48 h. Sample 2 consistently outperformed Sample 1, with values from 80.61% to 91.28% at 24 h and from 83.35% to 96.47% at 48 h.

Discussion: Both HAP-COL application techniques proved…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free