Evidence Hub

CHAnges in Diuretic Medication Prescribing and Surrogate Laboratory Parameters After Initiating EmpagliflOziN in Veterans (CHAMPION Cohort Study)

Tanvi Patil, Emily Halsey, Alamdeep Kaur, John Minchak, Jesse Hobson, Davida Eppes

Clinical drug investigation, 2022

1,189 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors have evolved into a novel drug class utilized for reductions in cardiovascular risk and heart failure hospitalization. We aimed to describe the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors on diuretic prescribing patterns and intermediate laboratory outcomes in patients with and without diuretic use.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients taking empagliflozin as of 1 July, 2021. Patients were assigned to the intervention group if prescribed a diuretic concomitantly or a control group otherwise. The primary outcome was the impact of empagliflozin on diuretic prescribing (i.e., no change, discontinuation, decrease, increase). Secondary outcomes were change in weight, hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood pressure, and electrolytes at 90 and 180 days. Mean differences were compared using the t-test between groups or the paired t-test within groups. Patients without diuretic use were matched 1:1 to patients taking diuretics using propensity scores.

RESULTS: This study included 1189 patients: 750 in the control group and 439 in the intervention group. After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. Of the 439 patients in the intervention group, 118 had changes in the diuretic regimen. There were 131 changes: 109 (83.2%) discontinuations, 13 (9.92%) decreases, and nine (6.87%) increases. The mean…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,189 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free