Evidence Hub

Association of empagliflozin treatment with changes in the metabolic score for insulin resistance in Iraqi adults with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month prospective cohort study

Rawnaq A. Aladhab

International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 2026

124 participants

Abstract

Background: The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) is an insulin-free surrogate that combines fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Evidence on its responsiveness to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition is limited.

Methods: In this 6-month prospective observational cohort study, 124 adults with type 2 diabetes were enrolled at Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital, Baghdad. Empagliflozin 10 mg/day was added to usual oral therapy in 62 patients according to routine prescribing and patient preference; 62 continued therapies without an SGLT2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Complete-case analyses included 58 and 56 participants, respectively. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change in METS-IR.

Results: At 6 months, mean METS-IR decreased from 48.6±6.2 to 42.8±5.8 in the empagliflozin group and from 49.1±6.5 to 48.5±6.4 in controls. The reported adjusted between-group difference was −5.42 points (95% CI −6.81 to −4.03; p<0.001). Empagliflozin exposure was also associated with larger reductions in HbA1c, body weight, body mass index, and triglycerides and a larger increase in HDL cholesterol. Within the empagliflozin group, change in METS-IR correlated with changes in HbA1c (r=0.48), triglycerides (r=0.41), and body mass index (r=0.35), but not fasting plasma glucose (r=0.18).

Conclusions: Empagliflozin initiation was associated with a clinically and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free