Evidence Hub

Patients With Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes Experience Higher Rates of Prosthetic Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty and Worse Implant Survival at 5 Years

H. Moore, Patrick J. Burroughs, Ru-Bin E. Lee, David B. Frumberg, P. Sculco, J. Grauer

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2021

3,518 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are genetic connective tissue disorders affecting multiple organ systems that frequently result in connective tissue hyperlaxity and early osteoarthritis. Short- and long-term outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in this cohort remain poorly characterized. Methods: Data were abstracted from the 2010 to 2018 PearlDiver Mariner administrative database. Patients with EDS undergoing total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were identified and matched 1:10 to patients without a diagnosis of EDS. Ninety-day incidence of postoperative complications and hospital readmission were identified and compared. Odds of 90-day adverse events were compared using multivariate logistic regression. Finally, 5-year implant survival was compared using a log-rank test. Significance was set at P < 0.005 after Bonferroni correction. Results: Matching was done for 354 patients with EDS to 3,518 patients without EDS. Patients with EDS had markedly higher rates of periprosthetic dislocation within 90 days of surgery (4.2% dislocation rate in EDS vs. 1.7% in matched control subjects, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with EDS continued to have increased odds of dislocation in the 90-day postoperative period (Odds Ratio=2.64, P = 0.001), whereas the rates of the other studied adverse events were not markedly different between groups. At 5 years, 92.7% of patients with EDS and 96.1% of the matched control subjects remained unrevised (significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,518 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free