Evidence Hub

Impact of Empagliflozin on the Outcomes of β-Thalassemia Major in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The THALEMPA Observational Study

Anas Ibraheem, Waseem F. Al-Tameemi

Cureus, 2024

20 participants

Abstract

Objective: Beta-thalassemia major (β-TM) is a genetic disorder characterized by ineffective erythropoiesis and chronic hemolytic anemia, necessitating lifelong blood transfusions and leading to severe complications. This study, termed THALEMPA by the authors, investigated the effect of empagliflozin (EMPA) on β-TM outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), focusing on disease severity and associated complications of iron overload and hyperuricemia. Methodology: This study conducted a single-center prospective observational investigation involving adults diagnosed with β-TM and T2DM. A total of 20 carefully selected patients were stratified into two groups based on their medical condition: the EMPA group, receiving 10 mg of empagliflozin, and a control group, receiving standard care. This focused cohort size was chosen to ensure a detailed, in-depth analysis of the treatment effects within this specific patient population. Over three months, both groups were closely monitored for β-TM outcomes. The study assessed β-TM severity parameters such as hemoglobin levels, blood transfusion frequency, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), left ventricular ejection fraction percentage, and spleen size. Additionally, β-TM complications were evaluated through serum ferritin and uric acid levels. Results: Our analysis revealed that EMPA increased hemoglobin levels by up to 0.56 g/dL compared to baseline (P < 0.05). Liver enzyme levels…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free