Evidence Hub

SGLT2 inhibitors and outcomes in the chronic Post-LVAD phase: a multicenter real-world cohort study

Jheng-Yan Wu, Keng-Wei Lee, Sheng-Chi Huang, Hsuan-Yuan Chang, Yu-Min Lin

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2026

1,318 participants

Abstract

Background The effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between SGLT2i use and adverse outcomes during the chronic post-LVAD phase. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network. Adults with LVAD implantation (2014–2025) who survived ≥90 days were included. SGLT2i exposure (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin) was identified by prescription records. A prespecified 90-day delayed outcome window defined follow-up from 3 months to 1 year after the index date. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure exacerbation (HFE). Secondary outcomes included HFE, all-cause mortality, and major adverse kidney events (MAKE). Propensity score matching (1:1) and Cox regression were applied. Results After matching, 1,318 patients were included in each group. SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of the primary composite endpoint (20.0% vs. 30.6%; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56–0.76; p < 0.001). Risks of HFE (18.4% vs. 26.9%; HR 0.69; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (4.2% vs. 7.3%; HR 0.60; p = 0.002), and MAKE (27.5% vs. 35.1%; HR 0.81; p = 0.003) were also lower. Safety outcomes were similar, including urinary tract infection (HR 0.69; p = 0.091) and diabetic ketoacidosis (HR 1.25; p = 0.437). Conclusion SGLT2i use was associated with lower risks of cardiovascular and kidney events in patients during the chronic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,318 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free