Evidence Hub

Individual SGLT-2 Inhibitors and Risk of New-Onset Cancer in Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Hayeon Kim, Jun-Ho Seo, Jin Hyun Nam, Y. Lim, Ji-Won Kim, B. Choi, Suin Kang, Youngjoo Byun et al.

Cancer research and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association, 2026

20,456 participants

Abstract

Purpose

Preclinical studies suggest that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) may have cancer-preventive effects; however, clinical evidence remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the use of SGLT-2is (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin) and the incidence of new-onset cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

This nationwide retrospective cohort study used Korean national health claims data. Patients with type 2 diabetes who started empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or other glucose-lowering drugs (oGLDs) between 2016 and 2019 were included, and propensity score matching between the SGLT-2is users and oGLDs users was applied. The primary outcome was overall cancer incidence, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of 11 site-specific cancers. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer incidence adjusted for covariates were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

After propensity score matching, each group comprised 20,456 patients. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of new-onset cancer in either the empagliflozin or dapagliflozin groups when compared to the oGLDs user group (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.12; adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.66-1.14, respectively). Similar results were observed in site-specific cancer incidence. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in overall or site-specific cancer incidence between the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20,456 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free