Evidence Hub

The effect of empagliflozin and sitagliptin as an add-on therapy to metformin in blood pressure reduction in diabetic patients in primary health care settings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Mayada Ahmed, M. Altoyan, Raghad Hijazi, Joud AlJebreen, Mohammed H Alshalan, Reema Aldhalaan, Lama Altarifi

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2025

44 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background/Aim: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition. Metformin is the first-line treatment, but if inadequate, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are recommended as add-on therapies. This study aimed to directly compare the effects of empagliflozin (SGLT2i) and sitagliptin (DPP4i) as add-on therapies to metformin in reducing blood pressure (BP) in a cohort of type 2 diabetes patients in routine care. Additionally, the study assessed the impact on HbA1c levels to optimize antidiabetic medication selection for better BP control. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, including diabetic patients aged 18–75. BP readings were compared at 12- and 24-week intervals. Patients had a confirmed diagnosis of T2DM, were prescribed either Janumet or Synjardy, and had at least one BP reading within 3 months before and 2–24 weeks after starting treatment. Exclusion criteria included antihypertensive medication use, medication changes, or taking antidiabetic drugs other than metformin. Data included demographics, vital signs, and lab results. Results: The study included 44 participants, with a mean age of 55.73 years and a baseline HbA1c of 9.17%. Participants were on Synjardy (43.2%) or Janumet (56.8%). No significant reduction in systolic or diastolic BP was found. However, HbA1c decreased from 9.17% to 7.52% after 6 months, with the greatest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free