Evidence Hub

Development of osteogenic chitosan/alginate scaffolds reinforced with silicocarnotite containing apatitic fibers

Karimi M, Mesgar AS, Mohammadi Z

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 2020

Abstract

Porous composite scaffolds of chitosan-alginate (CH-AL) reinforced by biphasic calcium phosphate fibers containing silicon (Si) were prepared using the freeze-drying method. The fibers were synthesized using a homogenous precipitation method with differing reaction times and were characterized by XRD, FTIR, SEM, and ICP-OES. Fibers produced with no Si incorporation using two different reaction times of 4 d and 8 d comprised two phases of hydroxyapatite (∼93-96 wt%) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). No new phases were observed by adding 0.8 wt% of Si during 4 d of precipitation. However, the addition of Si to fibers synthesized within 8 d under reflux conditions produced biphasic fibers with 1.9 wt% Si which consisted of a new phase of silicocarnotite (∼94 wt%) associated with the β-TCP phase. The whisker-like fibers were 10-200 µm in length and 0.2-5 µm in width. The physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties of composite scaffolds fabricated by adding different fiber contents and types were investigated. The scaffolds exhibited favorable microstructures with a high porosity (66-88%) and the interconnected pores varied in size between 40 and 250 µm. Scaffolds containing silicocarnotite showed a significant improvement in their mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity (using SBF testing and characterization of the apatite layer by ATR-FTIR and SEM/EDS) as well as proliferation, mineralization and adhesion of MG63 cells, when evaluated by MTT assay,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free