Evidence Hub

Design of molecules that specifically recognize and cleave apurinic sites in DNA.

Berthet N, Boudali A, Constant JF, Decout JL, Demeunynck M, Fkyerat A, Garcia J, Laayoun A et al.

Journal of molecular recognition : JMR, 1994

Abstract

We have prepared a series of tailor-made molecules that recognize and cleave DNA at apurinic sites in vitro. These molecules incorporate in their structure different units designed for specific function: an intercalator for DNA binding, a nucleic base for abasic site recognition and a linking chain of variable length and nature (including amino and/or amido functions). The cleavage efficiency of the molecules can be modulated by varying successively the nature of the intercalating agent, the nucleic base and the chain. All molecules bind to native calf thymus DNA with binding constants ranging from 10(4) to 10(6) M-1. Their cleavage activity was determined on plasmid DNA (pBR 322) containing 1.8 AP-sites per DNA-molecule. The minimum requirements for cleavage are the presence of the three units, the intercalator, the nucleic base and at least one amino function in the chain. The most efficient molecules cleave plasmid DNA at nanomolar concentrations. Enzymatic experiments on the termini generated after cleavage of AP-DNA suggest a strand break induced by a beta-elimination reaction. In order to get insight into the mode of action (efficiency, selectivity, interaction), we have used synthetic oligonucleotides containing either a true abasic site at a determined position to analyse the cleavage parameters of the synthetic molecules by HPLC or a chemically stable analog (tetrahydrofuran) of the abasic site for high field 1H NMR spectrometry and footprinting experiments. All…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal and cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free