Evidence Hub

1193-P: Health-Care Costs and Medication Burden in Routine Care Initiators of Empagliflozin: A First Analysis from the Empagliflozin Comparative Effectiveness and Safety (EMPRISE) Study

A. Pawar, E. Patorno, Anouk Déruaz-Luyet, K. Brodovicz, Anastasia Ustyugova, N. Gautam, L. G. Bessette, S. Schneeweiss et al.

Diabetes, 2019

2 citations

Abstract

EMPRISE studies the comparative effectiveness, safety and health care resource utilization of empagliflozin (EMPA) in Medicare and 2 U.S. commercial claims datasets (2014-2019). In this first analysis, we evaluated healthcare costs and medications burden associated with EMPA vs. dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) use in routine care patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We identified a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort of T2D patients ≥18 years initiating either EMPA or DPP-4i between 08/2014-09/2016. Total (inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy) cost and medication burden were compared for EMPA vs. DPP-4i. We identified 17,549 matched pairs with balanced baseline characteristics (Table 1) with mean follow-up of 5.4 months. Per member per year (PMPY) total cost was similar among EMPA vs. DDP4i initiators ($17,771 vs. $17,814; Diff= -$43, 95% CI: -1,380─1,295). Medical costs tended to be lower and pharmacy costs were higher in EMPA initiators. Distinct medication prescriptions were slightly lower among EMPA initiators [Incidence rate ratio 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96─0.98]. Results stratified by history of CV disease were consistent. Within the first two years of EMPRISE, we observed similar total cost, driven by trend towards lower medical and higher pharmacy costs, and lower medication burden in EMPA vs. DDP4i initiators. Disclosure A. Pawar: None. E. Patorno: Research Support; Self; National Institute on Aging. Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free