Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in heart failure

K. Bonnesen, U. Heide-Joergensen, T. Lash, M. Schmidt

European Heart Journal, 2025

6,264 participants

Abstract

No clinical trial has compared head-to-head the effects of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure.

To compare the risk of heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause death between initiators of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure.

This new-user, active-comparator cohort study used nationwide Danish healthcare data to emulate a hypothetical target trial that would compare the risk of heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause death in adults with heart failure initiating empagliflozin (intervention) or dapagliflozin (comparator) (Figure 1). Patients were identified from the Danish Heart Failure Registry, which enrolls patients at their first-time hospital contact with heart failure, meeting the European Society of Cardiology criteria. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure rehospitalization and all-cause death, while secondary outcomes included each component separately. Heart failure rehospitalization was identified from the Danish National Patient Registry and all-cause death from the Danish Civil Registration System. In intention-to-treat analyses, cumulative incidences were estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Follow-up began at treatment initiation (June 1, 2014–December 31, 2022) and continued until the first occurrence of an outcome, emigration, or study end (December 31, 2022). Baseline covariates (n=66) were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,264 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free