Evidence Hub

Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in CKD with or without Albuminuria

Motoki Odawara, H. Nishi, Satoshi Kodera, M. Kondo, M. Nangaku

American Society of Nephrology. Clinical Journal, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Visual Abstract Key Points Empagliflozin is cost-effective for the treatment of CKD in patients with an urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 30 mg/g or more. Empagliflozin is not cost-effective for the treatment of CKD in patients with an urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio ¥5,000,000 per QALY, regardless of the initial eGFR. The probabilities of empagliflozin being cost-effective were >84% in the macroalbuminuria or microalbuminuria cohorts but <30% in the negative albuminuria cohorts. Scenario analyses where empagliflozin suppressed the eGFR decline in the negative albuminuria cohorts showed that the drug was cost-effective in CKD stage G3b and G4 cohorts. Empagliflozin was not cost-effective in patients with CKD stage G3a and microalbuminuria with the observation period of 10 years. Conclusions In patients meeting the enrollment criteria for the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, the addition of empagliflozin to the standard treatment of CKD was judged as cost-effective for patients with albuminuria but not for those without albuminuria in the Japanese health care system.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free