Evidence Hub

Etiology and Outcomes of Pediatric Chest Pain in the ED: A Systematic Review

Sallam Mohamed MM, Mohamed Elamin HE, Mahmoud S, Abdalla A, Mohammed SK, Hussien Abdaallah SO, Ali Ahmed GH, Suliman HM

Cureus, 2026

14,871 participants

Abstract

Chest pain is a frequent complaint among children presenting to EDs, often raising concerns about underlying cardiac disease. This systematic review aimed to synthesize available evidence on the etiology, clinical outcomes, and prognosis of pediatric chest pain in ED settings. A systematic search of PubMed, BMJ Journals, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies reporting original data on children (<19 years) presenting with chest pain in ED settings were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Due to heterogeneity among the studies, a narrative synthesis of the findings was performed. Six retrospective studies comprising 14,871 patients from five countries met the inclusion criteria. Idiopathic chest pain was the most common etiology, accounting for 24.4%-45.4% of cases. Musculoskeletal (4.7%-33.0%), respiratory (2.9%-17.7%), and psychogenic causes (6.0%-21.6%) were also frequently reported. Cardiac etiology was rare in unselected populations (0.9%-1.5%), although a higher prevalence (7.1%) was observed in ambulance-attended cohorts. Hospitalization rates ranged from 0.3% to 7.2%, and cardiac interventions were required in fewer than 0.3% of patients. Mortality was reported to be below 0.2% across all studies. Five studies were rated as good quality, while one study was rated as fair quality. Pediatric chest pain in ED settings is predominantly benign, with idiopathic causes being the most…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 14,871 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free