Evidence Hub

Exploratory Mediation-Informed Analysis and Dose-Response Analysis of Uric Acid Reduction and Kidney Outcomes in SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy Compared to Allopurinol

Jámbor T, Tallósy SP, Lantos T, Szabó A, Fejes R

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

78 participants

Abstract

Background: Hyperuricemia has long been linked to the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), although the role of serum uric acid (sUA) reduction in kidney preservation remains uncertain. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lower sUA levels and exert renoprotective effects, but it is unclear whether these findings are mechanistically related. Methods: Adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperuricemia were included from a retrospective cohort. Patients treated with empagliflozin (n = 70) or dapagliflozin (n = 78) were pooled into a single group and compared with an allopurinol-treated group (n = 66). Exploratory mediation-informed analysis models assessed associations between treatment, changes in sUA (ΔsUA), and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR) at 12 and 36 months. Dose-response and nonlinear associations between ΔsUA and ΔeGFR were additionally examined. Results: At 12 months, SGLT2 inhibitor treatment was associated with greater ΔsUA compared with allopurinol (B = 22.62, p = 0.040); its direct association with ΔeGFR remained significant after adjustment for ΔsUA (B = -6.14, p < 0.001). At 36 months, the association of treatment with ΔsUA was no longer significant, whereas association with ΔeGFR persisted (B = -11.8, p < 0.001). No dose-response or nonlinear relationship was identified between ΔsUA and ΔeGFR, while treatment remained an independent predictor of ΔeGFR at both time points. Conclusions: Reductions in sUA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 78 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free