Evidence Hub

Comparative evaluation of clinical outcomes of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in type-2 diabetes mellitus

Doğruel H, Atlım HT, Aydemir M, Yılmaz N, Sarı R

Irish journal of medical science, 2023

342 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors provide additional benefits besides glycemic control.

AIM: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin.

METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated data retrieved from medical records of patients who were under follow-up with the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and were started on dapagliflozin or empagliflozin treatment between January 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020. Demographic features, comorbidities, clinical features, duration of diabetes, baseline, and follow-up laboratory test results were recorded. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: This study comprised 342 patients who are on the treatment with dapagliflozin (n = 228) or empagliflozin (n = 114). The glycosylated hemoglobin a1c (HBA1C) level was significantly decreased in both the dapagliflozin (8.18-7.59, p < 0.001) and empagliflozin (8.35-7.58, p < 0.001) groups. The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was also decreased in both groups. A decrease in urine ACR was observed independent of using a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blocker both in the whole group and in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The time to addition of a new anti-diabetic agent to the treatment was shorter in the dapagliflozin group (14.4 months vs 17.7 months, p = 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin are the drugs to choose for renoprotection in diabetics independent of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 342 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free