Evidence Hub

Facile synthesis of starch and tellurium doped SrO nanocomposite for catalytic and antibacterial potential: In silico molecular docking studies

Ikram M, Haider A, Imran M, Haider J, Naz S, Ul-Hamid A, Nabgan W, Mustajab M et al.

International journal of biological macromolecules, 2022

30 citations

Abstract

A chemical co-precipitation route was used to synthesize novel strontium oxide (SrO), SrO-starch composite and various tellurium (Te) concentrations were incorporated in SrO-starch composite. This study aims to enhance the catalytic activities and bactericidal behavior of SrO, SrO-starch composite with different percentage concentrations of Te doping and a fixed amount of starch nanoparticles. XRD affirmed that the dopant contribution was investigated to improve crystallinity. Surface morphological characteristics and elemental composition evaluation were determined using an FE-SEM and EDS exhibit a doping concentration of an element in the synthesized products. The configuration of Sr-O-Sr bonds and molecular vibrations has been indicated by FTIR spectra. In addition, dye degradation of prepared samples was investigated through catalytic activity (CA) in the existence of NaBH4 act as a reduction representative. The Te-doped SrO-starch composite indicates superior catalytic activity and shows a degradation of Methylene blue dye (91.4 %) in an acidic medium. The synthesis nanocatalyst demonstrated impressive antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) at high and low concentrations exhibiting zones of inhibition 9.30 mm as compared to ciprofloxacin. Furthermore, molecular docking studies of synthesized nanocomposites were performed against selected enzyme targets, i.e., β-lactamaseE.coli and DNA GyraseE.coli.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free