Evidence Hub

Improving process quality for pediatric emergency department

Kim BB, Delbridge TR, Kendrick DB

International journal of health care quality assurance, 2014

Abstract

PURPOSE: Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) leads to longer waiting times and results in higher number of patients leaving the ED without being seen by a physician. EDs need to improve quality for patients' waiting time and length of stay (LoS) from the perspective of process and flow control management. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The retrospective case study was performed using the computerized ED patient time logs from arrival to discharge between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. Patients were divided into two groups either adult or pediatric with a cutoff age of 18. Patients' characteristics were measured by arrival time periods, waiting times before being seen by a physician, total LoS and acuity levels. A discrete event simulation was applied to the comparison of quality performance measures.

FINDINGS: Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of arrival times, acuity levels, waiting time stratified for various arrival times and acuity levels. The process quality for pediatric patients could be improved by redesign of patient flow management and medical resource.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The results are limited to a case of one community and ED. This study did not analyze the characteristic of leaving the ED without being seen by a physician.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Separation of pediatric patients from adult patients in an ED can reduce the waiting time before being seen…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free