Comparison of free-energy methods using a tripeptide-water model system
Abstract
We investigate the ability of several free-energy calculation methods to combine two alchemical changes. We use Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR), thermodynamic integration (TI), extended TI (X-TI), and enveloping distribution sampling (EDS) to perturb a water molecule, which is restrained to an amino acid that is also being perturbed. In addition to these pairwise methods, we present two two-dimensional approaches, EDS-TI and two-dimensional TI (2D-TI). We compare feasibility, efficiency and usability of these methods in regard to our simple model system, which mimics the displacement of a water molecule in the active site of a protein on residue mutation. The correct treatment of structural water has been shown to greatly aid binding affinity calculations in some cases that remained elusive otherwise. This is of broad interest in, for example, drug design, and we conclude that thus far, the pairwise method BAR and also the newer X-TI remain the most suitable methods to treat this problem as long as few end states are involved. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Read the paper
Related studies
- The Matrisome: In Silico Definition and In Vivo Characterization by Proteomics of Normal and Tumor Extracellular Matrices
- The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: Its definition, characteristics, and capabilities
- In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling
- In silico prediction of splice-altering single nucleotide variants in the human genome
- In silico clinical trials: how computer simulation will transform the biomedical industry
- In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.