Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor in Heart Transplant Recipients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Ando S, Tsuji M, Kitamura S, Morishita K, Kaneko S, Hori N, Ishida J, Amiya E et al.

International heart journal, 2026

91 participants

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major long-term complication following heart transplantation (HT). The safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for HT recipients with CKD remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the records of HT recipients who were followed up between April 2017 and December 2024 at our hospital; those with CKD who initiated SGLT2i at least 6 months after HT and had available follow-up data for 6 subsequent months were included. Among 91 patients who initiated SGLT2i, 45 were eligible (median age: 50 [47-59] years; 11 (24.4%) female). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at SGLT2i initiation was 42.9 [33.8-50.6] mL/minute/1.73 m2. All patients continued SGLT2i without adverse events. Relative change in eGFR improved significantly from -9.1% in the 6 months before SGLT2i to +3.7% in the 6 months after (P = 0.043). Uric acid and hemoglobin levels improved (P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the relative change in eGFR to identify factors associated with improvement: those with a positive change (n = 23) and those without (n = 22). In logistic regression analysis adjusting for age and sex, lower eGFR (odds ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.15, P = 0.013) and non-ischemic etiology of heart failure (odds ratio: 18.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.66-215.0, P = 0.018) were associated with eGFR improvement after SGLT2i initiation. SGLT2i use appears…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 91 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free