Evidence Hub

Green synthesis, in silico modeling, and biological evaluation of N-substituted (Z)-5-arylidene imidazolidine/thiazolidine-2,4-dione/4-thione derivatives catalyzed by Bu SO3H core–shell nanostructures

Malihe Akhavan, Zohreh Esam, Atefeh Mirshafa, Maryam Lotfi, Saeed Pourmand, Froug Ashori, M. Rabani, G. Ekbatani et al.

RSC Advances, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

In this effort, the immobilization of guanidine–sulfonate on the surface of Fe3O4 MNPs (magnetic nanoparticles) as a novel acid nanocatalyst has been successfully reported for the synthesis of N-substituted (Z)-5-arylidene thiazolidine-2,4-dione and related cyclic derivatives, including rhodanine (RHD) and hydantoin (HYD) via a one-pot multiple-component reaction under green conditions. The products were characterized by SEM, TEM, TGA, EDS, BET techniques, VSM, and FTIR. The novel compounds synthesized using this methodology, designated as series La (1-9), Lb (1-8), and Lc (1-8), were subjected to anticancer screening against A549 and MCF7cell lines via MTT assays. Notably, several compounds (L1a, L2a, L3a, L1b, L2b, L3b, and L4b) exhibited potent antiproliferative activities, with observed IC50 values as low as 1.23 μM and 1.02 μM against MCF-7 cells, thereby outperforming the established anticancer drugs doxorubicin and cisplatin. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations revealed that ligands L1a, L2a, and L3a strongly interact with the protein target 3CD8, with L1a displaying significant hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions and L2a engaging in unique pi–pi stacking with key residues. For protein 2WGJ, ligand L4b exhibited exceptional binding affinity, characterized by robust hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and additional stabilizing mechanisms such as water bridges and pi interactions. Hence, N-substituted (Z)-5-arylidene thiazolidine-2,4-dione and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in cell cultures (in vitro) and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free