Evidence Hub

Assessment of the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of a group of Turkish pediatric glycogen storage disease type 1b patients with varying clinical presentations and a novel mutation

Küçükçongar Yavaş A, Engin Erdal A, Bilginer Gürbüz B, Ünlüsoy Aksu A, Kasapkara ÇS

Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM, 2023

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Glycogen storage disease (GSD) type 1b is a multisystemic disease in which immune and infectious complications are present, different from GSD type 1a. Treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often required in the management of neutropenia and inflammatory bowel disease. Recently, an alternative treatment option to G-CSF has been preferred, like empagliflozin. To report on the demographics, genotype, clinical presentation, management, and complications of pediatric patients with glycogen storage disease type 1b (GSD 1b).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the clinical course of eight patients with GSD type 1b whose diagnosis was confirmed by molecular testing.

RESULTS: The mean age at referral was four months. The diagnosis of GSD 1b was based on clinical and laboratory findings and supported by genetic studies. One patient presented with an atypical clinical finding in the form of hydrocephalus at the time of first admission. The first symptom was abscess formation on the scalp due to neutropenia in another patient. Other patients had hypoglycemia at the time of admission. All patients presented suffered from neutropenia, which was managed with G-CSF, except one. Hospitalizations for infections were frequent. One patient developed chronic diarrhea and severe infections, which have been brought under control with empagliflozin.

CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia is an essential finding in GSD 1b and responsible for complications. The coexistence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free