Evidence Hub

A Retrospective Analysis of Fixed Combination of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin in Addition to the Existing Treatment for its Clinical Effectiveness in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Clinical Experience

Gupta A, Malhotra P, Jamwal V, Khalse M

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2021

347 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and linagliptin (Empa/Lina), is demonstrated in adults with T2DM in the various trials. The study was planned to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Empa/Lina in a more representative population of the Indian outpatient setting.

METHODS: The study was conducted in poorly controlled T2DM patients being treated with Empa/Lina once daily (25/5mg) as an add on in a tertiary care institute in Jammu, India. Various efficacy and safety parameters were assessed prior to the initiation of Empa/Lina and thereafter at periodic intervals until week 12. Appropriate statistical tests were applied.

RESULTS: In a total of 347 eligible patients, the mean age (SD) was 57.84 ±7.3 years, Males were 49%, average body weight was 79.81±9.72 kg. The median duration of diabetes was 6.42±2.05 years. Empa/Lina as an add on therapy to other glucose-lowering treatment was associated with a significant lowering in HbA1c (-1.1 ±0.64 mg/dl), FPG level -47.11(±20.42) mg/dl, PPG level (-71.32± 26.56), body weight -2.64 (±1.97) kg and blood pressure parameters (systolic BP -7.68 ±5.2 and Diastolic BP -3.16±1.7) from baseline at 12 weeks. A total of 47.55 percent of patients responded to Empa/Lina (25/5mg) added in conjunction with other antidiabetes agents. There was no significant difference in glycemic parameters of various subgroups assessed based on concurrent antidiabetes drugs. However, a significant reduction in body weight of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 347 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free