Evidence Hub

Sensory Processing in Individuals With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Compared to Control Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

L. Jurek, Arnaud Duchier, C. Gauld, Léonie Henault, C. Giroudon, Pierre Fourneret, S. Cortese, Mikaïl Nourredine

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2025

5,374 participants · 48 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the association between Attention-Deficit/Deficit Hyperactivity (ADHD) and atypical Sensory Processing Patterns (SPPs).

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception until June 30th, 2024. We included studies examining SPP using questionnaires in participants with a diagnosis of ADHD compared with healthy controls. The study risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using R software (Version 4.3.1), considering sensory modulation atypicities severity as the primary outcome. We explored the risk of publication bias and conducted sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

After screening 10,750 references, we included 30 studies (reported in 32 publications) encompassing a total of 5,374 participants, with 23 studies focusing on children, and seven on adults. Patients with ADHD presented significantly more severe sensory atypicities than the control group in multiple domains: sensory sensitivity (k=13; SMD=1.17; 5% CI [0.75;1.59]; I2=87%), sensory avoiding (k=11; SMD=1.15; 95% CI [0.66;1.64]; I2=92%), low sensory registration (k=23; SMD=1.22; 95%CI [0.89;1.56]; I2=92%), and sensory seeking (k=15; SMD=1.23; 95%CI [0.48;1.97]; I2=97%). Heterogeneity was high in all analyses. Only nine studies were deemed at overall low risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Even though available ADHD clinical guidelines…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,374 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free