Evidence Hub

Global PTSD prevalence among active first responders and trends over recent years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrew F. Arena, Mikayla Gregory, D. Collins, B. Vilus, R. Bryant, Samuel B. Harvey, M. Deady

Clinical Psychology Review, 2025

34 citations

Abstract

First responders in emergency services are inherently exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events, increasing their risk for PTSD, burnout, and work incapacity. The current meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively compare PTSD prevalence within varied first responders in the context of both routine exposures and large-scale disasters, assess trends over recent years and differences between economic contexts. In January 2025, five databases were searched for peer-reviewed observational studies on employed or volunteering samples. Publication date was limited to post-2008, given meta-analyses addressing similar questions captured literature until this point. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions explored trends over time and the impacts of exposure category, occupation, economic context, volunteer status, sex, and PTSD measurement. Analyses included 138 studies (173 independent samples). General samples with routine exposures possessed greater prevalence (14.3 %) than samples exposed to large-scale disasters (8.3 %). For the first time, there was some evidence of increasing prevalence over time within routine exposure samples. Low/middle-income countries and non-volunteers exhibited greater PTSD prevalence than high-income countries and volunteers. Prevalence varied based on PTSD outcome measurement, although no differences emerged between occupational and sex subgroups. Increasing PTSD prevalence over time appears to have been largely driven by increases…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free