Evidence Hub

Personalized theta-burst stimulation enhances social skills in young minimally verbal children with autism: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Jinming Xiao, Yating Ming, Lei Li, Xin-Yue Huang, Yuanyue Zhou, J. Ou, Juan Kou, Rui Feng et al.

Biological Psychiatry, 2025

23 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally verbal children with autism are understudied and lack effective treatment options. Personalized continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) targeting the amygdala and its circuitry may be a potential therapeutic approach for this population.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, minimally verbal children with autism (ages 2-8 years) received 4 weeks of cTBS. An amygdala-optimized functional connectivity (AOFC) group (N=23) received personalized stimulation targeting a left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex site functionally connected with the amygdala. A non-optimized (NO) control group (N=21) received stimulation at a standard prefrontal site. We assessed changes in Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule scores, amygdala volume, spontaneous neural activity, and functional connectivity.

RESULTS

Personalized AOFC-guided cTBS improved social and communication skills with an effect size twice that of the NO group (Cohen's d = 0.55 vs. 0.24). The AOFC group showed greater reductions in amygdala volume, spontaneous neural activity, and hyper-connectivity. Network-level amygdala connectivity changes with default mode, frontoparietal, and dorsal attention networks were correlated with clinical improvements. Field mapping analysis revealed that greater electric field overlap between standard and optimized targets predicted better treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized AOFC-guided cTBS enhanced social skills and communication in minimally verbal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free