Evidence Hub

A sport-for-protection program reduces anxiety and depression in youth affected by displacement: A randomized controlled trial of the game connect program in Uganda

Kathleen Latimer, Rita Larok, John Paul Nyeko, Lydia Murungi, Ronald Luwangula, Bashir Lukungu, Jeroen Carrin, R. Nannungi et al.

Journal of Affective Disorders, 2025

834 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Youth affected by displacement are at risk for anxiety and depression. Supervised sport programs are a potentially effective strategy, however trials from displacement contexts are lacking.

METHODS

Displaced youth and youth from host communities in five humanitarian settings across Uganda aged 15 to 24 years, and with at least mild anxiety and/or depression, were randomized to a 16-week sport-for-protection program or a wait-list control condition. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9, adolescent version (PHQ-9-A) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Linear mixed modelling was conducted.

RESULTS

834 young people were randomized (421 in the experimental and 413 in the control condition; median age = 19.0 years; 46.9 % boys; 14.7 % with self-reported or observed disability; 29.5 % from host community and 70.5 % displaced youth). Large effect sizes were found for the anxiolytic (Cohen d = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.06-1.36) and antidepressant (Cohen d = 1.32, 95%CI = 1.17-1.47) effects of sport-for-protection in comparison with a wait-list control condition. In subgroup analyses, large effect sizes were observed in displaced youth (Cohen d GAD-7 = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.0-1.32; Cohen d PHQ-9-A = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.16-1.51) and youth from host communities (Cohen d GAD-7 = 1.34, 95%CI = 1.06-1.61; Cohen d PHQ-9-A = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.03-1.58); in boys (Cohen d GAD-7 = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.03-1.43; Cohen d PHQ-9-A = 1.36, 95%CI = 1.14-1.58) and girls…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 834 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free