Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Sitagliptin and Empagliflozin Combination Therapy in a Patient With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease and Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus: A Case Report

Makoto Wada, Yuri Mizuno, Amika Kajiyama, Shuji Toriumi, Takahide Hashimoto, Naoki Ohtake, Masaya Yamaga, Tomohiko Yoshida et al.

Cureus, 2025

Abstract

This case report describes a 61-year-old male with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A) who developed poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. The patient, with a history of CMT1A, was admitted for preoperative glycemic management prior to lumbar spinal stenosis surgery, exhibiting an HbA1c of 8.1%. Treatment with metformin had been insufficient. Considering potential insulin resistance due to decreased skeletal muscle mass from CMT and reduced mobility, a combination therapy of the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin and the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin was initiated post-surgery, alongside diet and exercise. Notably, this combination effectively improved glycemic control without reducing skeletal muscle mass. This suggests that the combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor and an SGLT2 inhibitor may be a viable therapeutic option for managing diabetes mellitus in patients with CMT, warranting further investigation in larger studies due to the rarity of this comorbidity. Long-term glycemic control is crucial for maintaining activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QOL) in these patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free