Evidence Hub

TraNscutaneOus Electrical VAgus Nerve Stimulation to Suppress Premature Ventricular Contractions: A Crossover, Randomized Clinical Trial (NoVa-PVC)

S. Zafeiropoulos, K. Coleman, Jonathan Kogan, Dimitrios Varrias, J. Leavitt, A. Bekiaridou, Theodoros Zanos, Stavros Zanos et al.

JACC Clinical Electrophysiology, 2025

36 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The autonomic nervous system has been implicated in the genesis of idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Antiadrenergic effects have been shown noninvasively by low-level electrical stimulation of the tragus (LLTS).

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy of LLTS in reducing PVC burden.

METHODS

This 2-center, prospective, sham-controlled, single-blinded, crossover randomized clinical trial was conducted in patients with symptomatic PVCs with at least 5% daily PVC burden and who were refractory to medical therapy. Participants received two sequential, 10-day sessions of active LLTS (20 Hz, 1 mA below the discomfort threshold) and sham stimulation (earlobe stimulation). Each treatment was interrupted by an 8-day washout period. Randomization determined the order of treatment. All patients wore an extended Holter monitor (ePatch; Philips) for daily PVC count during the study period.

RESULTS

Of the 36 randomized patients, 35 (19 [59.4%] male; mean age 58.0 ± 17.1 years) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The median baseline PVC burden was 12.00% (IQR: 11.4%). LLTS significantly reduced the median PVC burden by 13.4% compared with sham stimulation (10.5% [IQR: 14.4%] vs 8.59% [IQR: 8.45%]; P = 0.021). No significant differences in heart rate variability were observed between the 2 groups. Exploratory analyses revealed a more pronounced reduction in slow heart rate-dependent PVCs and a sustained decrease in PVC burden throughout…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 36 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free