Evidence Hub

Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Alveolar Ridges Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

M. Sanz, C. Gjerde, B. Gjertsen, A. Ortiz-vigon, N. Sánchez, A. Hoornaert, J. Caballé-Serrano, M. Giralt-Hernando et al.

Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2025

48 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of a cell‐based therapy for 3D bone augmentation of severe alveolar bone defects prior to dental implant placement. Materials and Methods A Phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a cell therapy using expanded autologous iliac crest‐derived mesenchymal cells seeded on a synthetic bioabsorbable bone substitute covered with a non‐resorbable membrane. The control group received an autogenous bone block graft. After 5 months, CBCT scans were compared to measure the bone volume changes achieved after the regenerative surgery. Subsequently, dental implants were placed in the regenerated areas. Results A total of 48 patients were included and randomized (36 patients in the test group and 12 in the control group). However, seven patients did not reach the minimum required number of expanded MSCs and were therefore unable to be treated. The tested intervention demonstrated significantly greater gains in bone volume, with a mean difference of 480.01 mm3 (p = 0.032). Similarly, the mean change in bone crest volume from baseline to 5 months was notably higher in the test group (1066.91 mm3) compared to the control group (586.9 mm3). Adverse reactions and patient morbidity were minor in both groups. Implants were placed on the regenerated bone, and all were integrated successfully in both groups. Conclusions The cell‐based therapy resulted in significant changes in bone volume compared to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free