Evidence Hub

Phase I Clinical Trial of High Doses of Seleno-L-methionine in Combination with Axitinib in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Y. Zakharia, Ryan J Reis, Matthew R. Kroll, Aseel O. Rataan, Srija Manchkanti, Bilal Rahim, R. Garje, U. Swami et al.

Clinical Cancer Research, 2025

27 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Data in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) xenografts defined the seleno-Lmethionine (SLM) dose and the plasma selenium concentrations associated with the enhancement of HIF1α/2α degradation, stabilization of tumor vasculature, enhanced drug delivery, and efficacy of axitinib. The data provided the rationale for the development of this phase I clinical trial of SLM and axitinib in advanced or metastatic relapsed ccRCC. Patients and Methods: Patients were ≥18 years with histologically and radiologically confirmed advanced or metastatic ccRCC who had received at least one prior systemic therapy, which could include axitinib (last dose ≥6 months prior to enrollment). Escalating dose levels of SLM (2500, 3000 and 4000 μg) were administered orally twice daily for 14 days, then once daily concurrently with axitinib 5 mg twice daily using a 3+3 design in Phase I. Patients were treated at the 4000 μg dose level in the expansion cohort to obtain preliminary estimates of efficacy. Results: No dose limiting toxicities occurred at the 4000 μg SLM dose level. Among the 27 patients treated with 4000 μg of SLM, the overall response rate was 55.6%, median duration of response was 18.4 months, median progression-free survival was 14.8 months, and median overall survival was 19.6 months. Preliminary results have shown that plasma selenium concentrations, inhibition of TGF-β1 and stabilization of tumor vasculature by SLM are time dependent. Conclusions: SLM (4000 μg) in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free