Evidence Hub

Use of the Probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri as an Adjunct to Subgingival Instrumentation in the Treatment of Periodontitis Patients With Diabetes: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Rocío Bujaldón, Eduardo Montero, Juan D Gamonal, A. Abuelo, María José Marín, M. Iniesta, M. Sanz, David Herrera

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2025

40 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of a Limosilactobacillus reuteri‐based probiotic as an adjunct to subgingival instrumentation in untreated periodontitis patients with diabetes. Methods A 6‐month, randomised, triple‐blinded clinical trial was conducted involving 40 patients, receiving steps 1 and 2 of periodontal therapy, including subgingival instrumentation, and randomised to receive tablets containing L. reuteri or placebo, for 3 months. Clinical and microbiological outcomes as well as glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations were evaluated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after therapy. Results At 6 months, both groups showed statistically significant reductions in the primary outcome (mean probing depth), with reductions of 0.9 mm in the probiotic group and 0.8 mm in the placebo group, with no significant differences between them. Both groups exhibited reductions in HbA1c levels after 6 months, more in the probiotic group (−0.6% vs. –0.1%), with statistically significant inter‐group differences (−0.5%; 95% confidence interval [−1.0; 0.0]; p < 0.001). Microbiological outcomes were similar. Conclusions The adjunctive use of a L. reuteri‐based probiotic did not provide additional clinical or microbiological benefits, compared to placebo, following subgingival instrumentation in patients with periodontitis and diabetes. However, statistically significant differences in HbA1c levels were observed, with larger reductions in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free