Evidence Hub

Evaluating antimicrobial effectiveness in acute uncomplicated cystitis: A retrospective single-center study

Nukaya T, Ishikawa K, Shiroki R

Journal of general and family medicine, 2025

730 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) is a urinary tract infection and is generally treated using antimicrobial therapy. Escherichia coli is the main causative agent of AUC. Recently, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant-E. coli has demonstrated a noticeable increase. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of appropriate antimicrobial treatment in AUC caused by E. coli in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed the records of patients with AUC treated at the urology department of Minami Cooperative Hospital between April 2016 and December 2020. Effectiveness was defined as clinical improvement.

RESULTS: The study cohort of 730 patients had a median age of 65.5 years (interquartile range, 57-78 years) and 23.2% were aged <55 years. E. coli was detected in 73.4% of patients, of whom 26.7% had levofloxacin (LVFX)-resistant strains. LVFX-resistant E. coli was associated with age ≥55 years and recurrent cases. Effectiveness was determined in 75.1% of cases, of which 75% complied with the Japanese or other international guidelines. The overall treatment effectiveness was highest with β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations (94.7%). The effectiveness of first- and third-generation cephalosporins (CPs) was 81.1-83.3%, and that of FQs and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (ST) was 82.6-83.8%. For LVFX-resistant E. coli, the treatment effectiveness was highest (100%) with BL/BLI combinations,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 730 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free