Evidence Hub

Comparison of an Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet and Physical Activity Versus an Ad Libitum Mediterranean Diet in the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes : A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

M. Ruiz-Canela, D. Corella, M. Martínez-González, N. Babio, J. A. Martínez, Lluís Forga, Á. Alonso-Gómez, J. Warnberg et al.

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2025

4,746 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited research has been done to evaluate the combined effect of energy reduction, Mediterranean diet (MedDiet), and physical activity on type 2 diabetes incidence.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether an energy-reduced MedDiet (erMedDiet) plus physical activity reduces diabetes incidence compared with a standard MedDiet.

DESIGN

Prespecified secondary outcome analysis in the PREDIMED (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea)-Plus randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. (ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN89898870).

SETTING

23 centers across Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

4746 adults aged 55 to 75 years with metabolic syndrome and overweight or obesity, without prior cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to an intervention group receiving an erMedDiet (planned reduction of 600 kcal per day), increased physical activity, and behavioral strategies for reducing weight, or a control group receiving ad libitum MedDiet advice.

MEASUREMENTS

Diabetes incidence was based on the American Diabetes Association criteria. Anthropometric measurements were obtained annually. Cox regression models were used to assess the intervention effect.

RESULTS

The 6-year absolute risk was 12.0% (95% CI, 11.9% to 12.1%) in the control group (349 cases) and 9.5% (CI, 9.4% to 9.5%) in the intervention group (280 cases). Over a median 6-year follow-up, diabetes incidence was 31% (CI, 18% to 41%) relatively lower in the intervention group compared with the control group, with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,746 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free