Evidence Hub

Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Stroke: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the ESPRIT Trial

Jing-Kuo Li, L. Lei, Yan Li, Hai-Bo Zhang, Xiaofang Yan, Ying Sun, Dejian He, Laijing Du et al.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2025

11,255 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) accounts for one-half of the population attributable fraction for stroke, so lowering SBP is the most important treatment for preventing stroke.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the authors sought to assess the effects of intensive treatment targeting SBP <120 mm Hg on stroke compared with standard treatment targeting SBP <140 mm Hg.

METHODS

In the ESPRIT trial, hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to intensive treatment or standard treatment and followed for 3.4 years. We fitted Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine the effects on the incidence of stroke, one of the prespecified secondary outcomes. In addition, we performed post hoc analyses including effects on stroke subtypes and the landmark analyses about stroke and stroke subtypes.

RESULTS

We randomized 11,255 participants (3,022 with previous stroke). Their mean age was 64.6 ± 7.1 years, and 4,650 (41.3%) were female. During the follow-up, the mean SBP was 119.1 ± 11.1 mm Hg in the intensive arm and 134.8 ± 10.5 mm Hg in the standard arm. Stroke occurred in 262 participants (4.7%) in the intensive arm and 303 (5.4%) in the standard arm (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.02; P = 0.083), ischemic stroke in, respectively, 243 (4.3%) vs 261 (4.6%) (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.78-1.11; P = 0.423), and hemorrhagic stroke 23 (0.4%) vs 45 (0.8%) (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.85; P = 0.009). Landmark analysis showed that the risk difference in stroke…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,255 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free