Evidence Hub

Factors influencing early initiation of breastfeeding in Afghanistan: secondary analysis of the Afghanistan MICS 2022–23

Essa Tawfiq, Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai, Zarghoon Tareen, Sayed Ali Shah Alawi, A. Wasiq, O. Dadras

International Breastfeeding Journal, 2025

11,992 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Initiating breastfeeding immediately within the first hour following birth has positive effects on the mother’s and newborn’s health and wellbeing. Little is known about the early initiation of breastfeeding and associated factors in Afghanistan. In this study, we addressed this research gap. We used data from the Afghanistan Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 2022–23. Data were analysed from 11,992 ever-married women, aged 15–49 years, who delivered a live child in the last 2 years before the survey. The outcome was early initiation of breastfeeding and defined as initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of birth. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with early initiation of breastfeeding. Out of 11,992 women, 46.9% initiated breastfeeding within the first hour of birth. The likelihood of early initiation of breastfeeding was greater in women with secondary or higher education (AOR 1.44 [95% CI 1.26, 1.63]), in women belonging to the second wealth quintile (AOR 1.17 [95% CI 1.04, 1.31]), in women who had access to media (AOR 1.15 [95% CI 1.03, 1.29]), and in women who had mobile phones (AOR 1.25 [95% CI 1.15, 1.37]). The likelihood was lower in women who gave birth at home (AOR 0.60 [95% CI 0.55, 0.66]), at private hospitals or clinics (AOR 0.65 [95% CI 0.56, 0.76]), as compared to women who gave birth at public clinics or hospitals, and in women living in rural areas (AOR 0.88 [95% CI 0.78, 0.95]). Women who had C-section for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,992 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free