Evidence Hub

Assessment of six insulin resistance surrogate indexes for predicting stroke incidence in Chinese middle-aged and elderly populations with abnormal glucose metabolism: a nationwide prospective cohort study

Luqing Jiang, Tengxiao Zhu, Wen-Jing Song, Ying Zhai, Yu Tang, Fengxia Ruan, Zichen Xu, Lei Li et al.

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

74 citations

Abstract

Estimate glucose disposal rate (eGDR), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), triglyceride-glucose (TyG), TyG-body mass index (TyG-BMI), metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) are considered surrogate indexes of insulin resistance (IR). There is a lack of studies comparing the predictive values of different IR surrogate indexes for stroke risk among individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between six IR surrogate indexes and stroke risk in individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism, evaluate their predictive abilities for stroke risk. Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were analysed in this study. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to analyse the relationships of IR surrogate indexes with stroke risk. The dose-response relationships between IR surrogate indexes and stroke risk were explored using restricted cubic splines. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of IR surrogate indexes were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. After adjusting for potential confounders, we observed that each standard deviation (SD) increase in eGDR was associated with a reduced risk of stroke, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.746 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.661–0.842]. In contrast, each SD increase in CVAI, TyG, TyG-BMI, METS-IR, and AIP were associated with an increased risk of stroke, with adjusted ORs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free