Evidence Hub

Association between non-insulin-based insulin resistance indicators and frailty progression: a national cohort study and mendelian randomization analysis

H. Tian, Yong-meng Li, Cheng-Qiang Wang, Guo-qiang Chen, Ying Lian

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

6,722 participants · 30 citations

Abstract

Insulin resistance (IR) is linked to an increased risk of frailty, yet it remains unclear whether the non-insulin-based IR indicators are associated with frailty trajectories and physical function decline. It aimed to examine the associations of triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and with long-term deficit-accumulation frailty trajectories and physical function decline. Data from 6722 participants in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were analyzed. Baseline TyG index, METS-IR, eGDR, along with the frailty index (FI) over nine years, were calculated. FI trajectories were assessed using group-based trajectory model (GBTM). Logistic regression models were used to analyze the associations between IR indicators with FI trajectory and frailty risk. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) models were utilized to detect potential dose-response associations. Linear mixed-effects model was used to evaluate associations with FI development speed. Age, gender, educational level, marital status, smoking status, drinking status, life satisfaction, social activity and sleep duration were adjusted. Additionally, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to assess the causality of observed associations. Three FI trajectories including low-stable frailty, moderate-increasing frailty, and accelerated rising frailty were identified. Regarding the frail risk, each SD increment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,722 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free