Evidence Hub

Lifetime progression of IgA nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study with extended long-term follow-up

M. Rivedal, O. Nordbø, Y. Haaskjold, R. Bjørneklett, T. Knoop, Ø. Eikrem

BMC Nephrology, 2025

8,738 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) exhibits an unpredictable trajectory, creating difficulties in prognostication, monitoring, treatment, and research planning. This study provides a comprehensive depiction of the progression of kidney function throughout the disease course, from diagnosis to a span of 36 years post-diagnosis. We utilized a cohort of 400 Norwegian IgAN patients, from diagnosis to the occurrence of death, initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), or the latest follow-up. Recorded proteinuria (n = 2676) and creatinine (n = 8738) measurements were retrieved. Patients were divided into subgroups based on their specific estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slopes. Median follow-up was 16 years. During this period, 34% of patients either died or initiated KRT. Among patients who reached endpoint, the median duration from diagnosis to the initiation of KRT or death was 8 years. Notably, 34% of the cohort exhibited a stable disease course, characterized by an eGFR decline of less than 20% between two consecutive measurements. Differences in subsequent disease trajectories among two subgroups with similar eGFR levels at diagnosis could not be accounted for by variations in treatment strategies. Among patients with proteinuria < 1 g/24 h in less than half of the measurements, KRT was five times more prevalent compared to those with more than half of the measurements recording proteinuria < 1 g/24 h (p-value = 0.001). While a significant proportion of IgAN patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 8,738 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free