Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination against high-grade cervical lesions by age and doses: a population-based cohort study

Shi-Qiang Wu, Alexander Ploner, Ana Martina Astorga Alsina, Yun-Yang Deng, Lina Ask Schollin, J. Lei

The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 2025

33 citations

Abstract

Summary Background One or two-dose schedule for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended by the World Health Organization and used in many vaccination programs. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of quadrivalent HPV vaccine against high-grade cervical lesions by age at vaccination and number of doses received. Methods This cohort study included 2,200,495 females aged 10–35 years old who were residents of Sweden between 2006 and 2022, with 584,676 (26.6%) receiving at least one dose of quadrivalent HPV vaccine. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRR) comparing the incidence rate of high-grade cervical lesions in relation to age at vaccination and doses. Findings In girls initiating vaccination before age 15, we observed IRRs of 0.42 (95% CI 0.33–0.52) after one-dose, 0.54 (0.47–0.63) after two-dose, and 0.50 (0.47–0.53) after three-dose. The IRRs were 0.60 (95% CI 0.52–0.70), 0.55 (0.49–0.62), and 0.54 (0.52–0.56) after one, two or three doses for girls who initiated vaccination age 15–17. For women who initiated vaccination after age 20, higher doses may be needed to achieve a statistically significant risk reduction. Interpretation Receiving one or two doses of HPV vaccines prior to age 17, especially for those initiating before age 15, has comparable effectiveness against high-grade cervical lesions with those who received three doses. Funding 10.13039/501100004359Swedish Research Council,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free