Evidence Hub

Mortality due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia: a five-year cohort study in intensive care patients

Stamatis Karakonstantis, Evangelos I. Kritsotakis, Renatos-Nikolaos Tziolos, Loukia Vassilopoulou, Maria Loukaki, Despoina Kypraiou, Emmanouil C. Petrakis, Alberto Tovil et al.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2025

400 participants · 30 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) has emerged as a major and difficult-to-treat nosocomial pathogen. This study estimated the mortality associated with CRAB bacteraemia in patients receiving treatment in the intensive care unit. A susceptible-infection counterfactual framework was applied to reflect the potential benefit of improved antimicrobial therapy.

METHODS

A five-year (2019-2023) cohort study was conducted in a tertiary-care referral hospital in Greece. Competing risks survival analysis methods were applied to estimate excess in-hospital mortality due to CRAB bacteraemia by comparing patients infected by CRAB to those infected by other more susceptible Gram-negative bacteria (GNB).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 400 intensive care patients with GNB bacteraemia (median age 70 years, 65% male). CRAB was the most common pathogen (43%), followed by K. pneumoniae (12%), E. coli (11%), and P. aeruginosa (10%). Patients with CRAB bacteraemia experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality at 14 days (35% vs. 21%), 28 days (53% vs. 30%) and overall (74% vs. 52%) compared to patients with other GNB bacteraemia. Multivariable competing-risks regression confirmed that CRAB bacteraemia was independently associated with increased risk of 28-day inpatient death (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.28-2.54; sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.84, 95% CI 1.28-2.62), simultaneously lowering the probability of discharge alive (csHR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free