Evidence Hub

Derivatives of the triglyceride–glucose index and their association with incident hypertension in prehypertensive individuals: a 4-year cohort study augmented by mendelian randomization

Mengmeng Wang, Tianqi Teng, Nan Zhang, Jiachao Xu, Zihan Dong, Q. Jiao, Ning Zhang, Hai-Chu Yu

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

2,815 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

The direct association between elevated levels of the triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index) and its derived metrics and the risk of new-onset hypertension in prehypertensive populations remains unclear. The study systematically evaluated the link between the TyG index and its related indicators with new-onset hypertension by integrating cohort study methods with Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. A total of 2,815 prehypertensive participants from the 2011 CHARLS database were included, of whom 877 (31.15%) progressed to new-onset hypertension by 2015. TyG-Waist-to-Height Ratio (TyG-WHtR), TyG-Body Mass Index (TyG-BMI), TyG-Waist Circumference (TyG-WC), and the TyG index were calculated. Logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves, subgroup analyses, and interaction tests were performed to assess the associations. Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR) was further used to validate causal relationships. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that each unit increase in the TyG index was associated with a 45% higher risk of new-onset hypertension (odds ratio [OR]: 1.45, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.24–1.70, P < 0.001), while TyG-WHtR showed a 42% increased risk (OR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.26–1.60, P < 0.001). Categorizing the TyG and its derived metrics by quartiles demonstrated that higher quartiles (Q3 and Q4) were significantly linked to an elevated risk of new-onset hypertension across all models (P < 0.001). RCS models indicated significant positive linear…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,815 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free