Evidence Hub

Advanced therapies in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, cohort study

Bryant R. England, J. F. Baker, M. George, Tate M. Johnson, Yangyuna Yang, P. Roul, Halie Frideres, H. Sayles et al.

The Lancet Rheumatology, 2025

234 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Background: There is uncertainty regarding patient outcomes with using tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) vs. other biologic and targeted-synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (non-TNFi b/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Therefore, we compared survival and respiratory hospitalization outcomes following TNFi or non-TNFi b/tsDMARD treatment initiation in RA-ILD. Methods: We performed an active-comparator, new-user cohort study with propensity score matching following the Target-Trial-Emulation Framework using national U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic and administrative health records between 1/1/2006 and 6/30/2021. VA healthcare enrollees fulfilling a validated administrative algorithm for RA-ILD and no prior receipt of ILD directed therapies (e.g., antifibrotics) initiating a TNFi or non-TNFi b/tsDMARD were studied. Propensity score matching was performed using demographics, healthcare utilization, health behaviors, comorbidity burden, RA-related severity factors, and ILD-related severity factors, including baseline forced vital capacity. Study outcomes were respiratory hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and respiratory-related death over up to 3-years of follow-up from VA, Medicare, and National Death Index data. Patients were not involved in the study. Findings: We matched 237 TNFi and 237 non-TNFi initiators with a mean age of 68 years and 92% (n=234) being male. The composite outcome of death or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 234 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free