Evidence Hub

GUIDE: a prospective cohort study for blood-based early detection of gastrointestinal cancers using targeted DNA methylation and fragmentomics sequencing

Ao Huang, De-Zhen Guo, Zhi-Xi Su, Yun-Shi Zhong, Liang Liu, Z. Xiong, Dong-Li He, B. Yan et al.

Molecular Cancer, 2025

1,057 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are among the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. Early, non-invasive detection is essential for timely intervention and improved survival. To address this clinical need, we developed GutSeer, a blood-based assay combining DNA methylation and fragmentomics for multi-GI cancer detection. Genome-wide methylome profiling identified 1,656 markers specific to five major GI cancers and their tissue origins. Based on these findings, we designed GutSeer, a targeted bisulfite sequencing panel, which was trained and validated using plasma samples from 1,057 cancer patients and 1,415 non-cancer controls. The locked model was blindly tested in an independent cohort of 846 participants, encompassing both inpatient and outpatient settings across five hospitals. In the validation cohort, GutSeer achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.950 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.937–0.962] for cancer detection, with 82.8% sensitivity (95% CI: 79.5–86.0) and 95.8% specificity (95% CI: 94.3–97.2). It detected 92.2% of colorectal, 75.5% of esophageal, 65.3% of gastric, 92.9% of liver, and 88.6% of pancreatic cancers. The independent test cohort included 198 early-stage cancers (stage I/II, 66.4%) and 63 advanced precancerous lesions. GutSeer maintained robust performance, with 81.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 77.1–85.9) for GI cancers and 94.4% specificity (95% CI: 92.4–96.5). It also demonstrated the ability to detect advanced precancerous lesions in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,057 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free