Evidence Hub

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-led Risk-adapted Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Updated Results from a Large Cohort Study

C. Englman, B. Adebusoye, D. Maffei, V. Stavrinides, Joshua Bridge, A. Kirkham, Clare Allen, Louise Dickinson et al.

European Urology, 2025

1,150 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-led active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer uses prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and MRI for regular monitoring with biopsy only when indicated by changes in MRI or PSA density.

METHODS

This clinical cohort, which started AS between February 2000 and July 2023, includes those with (1) Gleason score (GS) ≤3 + 4, (2) PSA <20 ng/ml, and (3) at least two MRI scans. The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS) defined as histological upgrade to GS ≥4 + 3 or transition to treatment. Patients were risk stratified by baseline MRI visibility and Gleason pattern 4, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare groups.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The cohort consisted of 1150 patients with a median follow-up of 64 mo per person overall (quartiles: 32, 107). At baseline, of these 1150 patients, 412 (36%) had GS 3 + 4, 627 (55%) had an MRI-visible lesion, and 201 (17%) had MRI-visible Gleason 3 + 4 disease. The EFS rate at 5 yr was 91% (95% confidence interval: 88-94%) for nonvisible GS 3 + 3, 71% (65-78%) for MRI-visible GS 3 + 3, 70% (63-78%) for nonvisible GS 3 + 4, and 44% (35-54%) for MRI-visible GS 3 + 4. A total of 487 patients had follow-up biopsies, with 74 having more than one, and histological upgrade to GS ≥4 + 3 was uncommon, occurring in 67 patients. Progression to nodal or bone metastases occurred in ten patients and only in those who had declined the recommended follow-up MRI and/or biopsies. Thirty…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,150 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free