Evidence Hub

Enablers and Barriers to Home Management for Children with Gastroenteritis: Systematic Review

Weghorst AAH, Lawrence J, Jansen DEMC, Holtman GA, Sanci LA, Berger MY, Hiscock H

Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify enablers and barriers to home management for children with acute gastroenteritis perceived by health care professionals and caregivers.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health. Studies from high-income countries published from 2003 to 2023 who included children with acute gastroenteritis younger than 6 years, treated via home management, and addressed enablers or barriers from the perspective of healthcare professionals or caregivers, were eligible for inclusion. Studies were independently reviewed for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment. Data synthesis was conducted using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model.

RESULTS: In total, 4476 studies were screened, with 16 meeting the inclusion criteria. The commonest enablers for health care professionals concerned the "opportunity" component (ie, access to clinical decision tools, protocols, provision of free oral rehydration therapy), followed by their "capability" component (ie, knowledge about guidelines, oral rehydration therapy, and ondansetron) to initiate home management. Conversely, caregivers' factors relied more on internal factors within the "motivation" component (ie, emotions, insecurity, need for reassurance), whereas "opportunity" components (ie, information sheets, monitoring calls) could assist them in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free